Johnson & Johnson v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2017
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1051 (§ 1 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Tynan v. United States · Le Blume Import Co. v. Coty · Beef/Eater Restaurants, Inc. v. James Burrough Ltd. · J. C. Hall Co. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. · Younghusband v. Kurlash Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.