Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 GAAPP 348 - Edvalson v. the State

Edvalson v. the State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bell v. Wolfish · Whalen v. United States · Serfass v. United States · State v. Marlowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause ... that protects a defendant from pretrial punishment. Thus, the appropriate remedy for pretrial punishment ... is to bring a petition for habeas corpus or other proceeding under the Due Process Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.