Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 Ill. App. 3d 443 - People v. Green

339 Ill. App. 3d 443 - People v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 364 Ill. App. 3d 888 - People v. Barnes (2006), 362 Ill. App. 3d 106 - People v. Boand (2005)

49 state decisions

230200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Fensterer · 66 Ill. 2d 551 - People v. King · 91 Ill. 2d 346 - People v. Dixon · 203 Ill. 2d 335 - People v. Crespo · 66 Ill. 2d 317 - People v. Monroe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cross-examination to show interest, bias or motive on the part of a witness is a matter of right, subject only to the broad discretion of the trial court to preclude repetitive or unduly harassing interrogation and, assuming a proper subject matter, to control the extent of cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Intent is a state of mind which, if not admitted, can be established by proof of surrounding circumstances, including the character of the assault, the use of a deadly weapon, and other matters from which an intent to kill may be inferred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[P]otential limitations on a defendant's right to cross-examine a witness as to bias, interest or motive to testify falsely are clearly rooted in the relevancy concepts of materiality and probative value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.