Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 Mich. 265 - Budwit v. Herr

Budwit v. Herr’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Craft (2002), Preston v. Chabot (1980)

4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

1201954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An estate by entirety is sometimes regarded as a species of, or modified form of, joint tenancy, the modification being rendered necessary by the common-law theory that husband and wife are but one person. The unities of time, title, interest, and possession are common to both estates but in an estate by entirety there is an additional unity, namely, that of person. Strictly speaking, a tenancy by entirety is not a joint tenancy but is a sole tenancy, and, while the 2 estates resemble each other and possess some qualities in common, yet they differ both in form and substance and are distinguishable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In Michigan, as the above decisions and others of similar import clearly show, it [a tenancy by the entireties] differs from ordinary joint tenancy in that the marital relation is an essential incident. ****** Obviously, if the theoretic unity of the spouses is destroyed, in other words if the marital relation is terminated, the estate by the entireties may not continue as such.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.