Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 N.J. Super. 63 - Panitch v. Panitch

339 N.J. Super. 63 - Panitch v. Panitch’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Liteky et al United States · Sutton v. United States · Sanders v. United States · State v. Marshall · Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is any other reason which might preclude a fair and unbiased hearing and judgment, or which might reasonably lead counsel or the parties to believe so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unless the alleged cause of recusal is known by [the judge] to exist or is shown to be true in fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, before the court may be disqualified on the ground of an appearance of bias, the belief that the proceedings were unfair must be objectively reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.