Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 Or. 673 - State v. Upton

State v. Upton’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “effect some kind of disadvantageous change upon a defendant”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutionally required to be found by a jury in order to increase the sentence that may be imposed upon conviction of a crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “retroactive alterations of evidentiary rules that make it easier for the state to obtain a conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.