Application of Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2021
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eggers v. California · 85 Okla. Crim. 173 - Ex Parte Matthews · 86 Okla. Crim. 401 - Ex Parte Motley · 93 Okla. Crim. 106 - Ex Parte Hunt · 93 Okla. Crim. 300 - Ex Parte Paul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At all events, laches prevents consideration at this late date. If a new trial in each case was granted after over twenty-four years lapse of time, the probabilities would be that it would be impossible to find the persons with knowledge of the facts surrounding the deaths of the two persons petitioner was charged with murdering. One cannot sit by and wait until lapse of time handicaps or makes impossible the determination of the truth of a matter, before asserting his rights. This is in accordance with the uniform holding of this Court over a long period of years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paxton v. State“We have said that where petition for habe-as corpus is delayed for a period of time so long that minds of trial judge and court attendants become clouded by time and uncertainty as to what happened, or due to dislocation and death of witnesses, and loss of records, the rights sought to be asserted have become matters of speculation, right for relief by habeas corpus may be lost by laches....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paxton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.