339 So. 2d 172 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2017
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harrell v. State · King v. State · 90 So. 2d 123 - Hazen v. Mayo · 223 So. 2d 746 - Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a crime is itself an attempt to do an act or accomplish a result, there can be no attempt to commit that crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“uttering is proved as fully by an attempt to negotiate a forged instrument as it is proved by a completed negotiation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Longval v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.