Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

339 So. 2d 271

State Ex Rel. Gerstein v. Baker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1976

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1976-11-09

Relies on Thomas v. State

Decided 1976-11-09

STATE of Florida ex rel. Richard E. GERSTEIN, State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Relator,
v.
The Honorable H. Paul BAKER and the Honorable Herbert M. Klein, As Judges of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Respondents.

No. 76-1720.

¶1District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 9, 1976.

¶2Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Kurt Marmar, Asst. State Atty., for relator.

¶3George Nichols, Miami, for respondents.

¶4Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6On September 9, 1976, the relator, Richard E. Gerstein, State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, filed a suggestion for writ of prohibition seeking to prohibit the respondents, judges of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, from exercising jurisdiction of a cause without a jury where the State had not consented to such proceeding.

¶7Florida R.Crim.P. 3.260, Waiver of Jury Trial, provides in toto:

A defendant may in writing waive a jury trial with the consent of the State. [Emphasis added.] 34 Fla. Stat. Ann. 38 (1975).

¶8This rule was recently interpreted by us in Thomas v. State,328 So.2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), and we follow our holding in that decision, to-wit: the state must consent to a waiver of a jury trial sought by a defendant.

¶9We therefore order that the writ of prohibition sought by the relator be issued and made absolute.

/339/so2d/271 · .json · Public domain