Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 So. 2d 804 - State v. Corey

339 So. 2d 804 - State v. Corey’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 1993
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1993

16 state decisions

80197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Roberts v. Louisiana · United States v. Hall · 340 So. 2d 157 - State v. Jenkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A permanent record made in the ordinary course of business, by a person unavailable for testimony, from personal knowledge of the facts recorded or from information furnished by one having a business duty to observe and report the facts, is admissible as proof of the facts recorded, in the absence of a strong motive to misrepresent, if the record is the first collected and recorded memorial." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"(1) whether, prior to interrogation, probable cause existed to arrest the accused; (2) statements or actions by the police indicating an intention to hold or restrain him; (3) statements or actions by the accused indicating his reasonable belief that he is in custody; and (4) the extent to which the investigation has focused on the accused."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This court felt that the documents were business documents kept in the usual course of business, [and] that they were properly identified by the retrieving officer....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.