339 So. 2d 829 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably State v. Shapiro (1983), 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Roberts v. Louisiana · 340 So. 2d 157 - State v. Jenkins · 315 So. 2d 727 - State v. Monk · State v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Defendant maintains that when the death penalty was declared unconstitutional, first degree murder lost its status as a capital crime, and he should have been remanded to the custody of the juvenile court. (Cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 933(2):" `"Capital offense" means an offense that may be punished by death'). The identical issue was raised after Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 , 92 S.Ct. 2726 , 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), struck down the death penalty provision of our prior first degree murder statute, La.R.S. 14:30 (1950). State v. Whatley, 320 So.2d 123 (La.1975). Whatley held that the district court retained jurisdiction over a juvenile charged with first degree murder because `as enacted, La.R.S. 14:30 (1950) constituted a legislative classification that the crime of murder constituted a capital offense, and that conduct punishable by this statute remained a "capital" crime for purposes of Louisiana law (even though Furman held that the death sentence could not actually be imposed or executed.' 320 So.2d at 125 . Defendant was charged, tried and convicted for an offense which the legislature classified as `capital,' and Roberts has no bearing upon the jurisdiction of the district court in this matter." 339 So.2d 829, 835 (La.1976).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Except as otherwise provided herein, the [juvenile] court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction in proceedings: “A. Concerning any child whose domicile is within the parish or who is found within the parish: * * * * * * “(5) Who violates any law or ordinance, except a child charged with having committed a capital crime or a crime defined by any law defining attempted aggravated rape after having become fifteen years of age. . . . ” (Italics ours.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.