Cannon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““At trial appellant tendered the following charge: ‘9. I charge you, members of the Jury, that the evidence against the Defendant is partly circumstantial and his innocence must be presumed by the Jury, until the case against him is proved in all its material circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt; to find him guilty as charged, the evidence must be strong and cogent, and unless it is so strong and cogent as to show his guilt to a moral certainty, the Jury must find him not guilty.’ Nothing in the oral charge covered circumstantial evidence. “The refusal thereof was error. Gilmore v. State, 99 Ala. 154 , 13 So. 536 (Charge 6) and Fowler v. State, 155 Ala. 21 , 45 So. 913 (Charge 18). Rule 45 does not apply because of the omission of any charge covering the principles of law as to circumstantial evidence.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 376 So. 2d 810 - Graham v. State

2. ““The State’s proof was that certain tools used in the burglary resembled those bought by Cannon, and in one instance by a friend at his behest, from a hardware store at or near Opp. Also, after being accused, appellant fled. He testified this was to avoid a marijuana prosecution.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 376 So. 2d 810 - Graham v. State