Perkins v. Ingalsbe’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. United Textile Workers, A. F. L. Local 1802 · Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Muse · Beyer v. Templeton, County Judge · Countz v. Mitchell · Scarbrough v. Eubank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The Court erred in finding that plaintiff alleged no acts or conduct on the part of Respondent sufficient in law to constitute such fraud or other ground as would authorize the Court to grant the petition for mandamus. The District Court clearly has such power under the facts alleged."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perkins v. Ingalsbe“petition for mandamus must, in order to determine the rights herein involved, contain allegations of facts, not conclusions showing that the Judge was guilty of fraud in revoking his order for an election. Word v. Schow, 29 Tex.Civ.App., 120 , 68 S.W. 192 , (writ refused), * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perkins v. Ingalsbe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.