Deuchler v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2016
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powers v. Shore · Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Ranger v. Tullos · 221 Mo. App. 152 - Sikes v. Chaney · Bank of Moberly v. Meals · J. B. Colt Co. v. Gregor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the settled law of this state that parol agreements made prior to or contemporaneously with the execution of the note, which tend to contradict or vary the terms of the note, cannot be set up as a defense to a suit on the note. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass’n of Missouri v. Theiss, 342 Mo. 40 , 111 S.W.2d 189 ; Bay v. Elmer, Mo.App., 237 S.W.2d 932 ; Farmers’ Bank of Weatherby v. Redman, Mo.App., 24 S.W.2d 235 ; Main Street Bank v. Ennis, 222 Mo.App. 915 , 7 S.W.2d 391 ; Farmers’ State Bank v. Miller, 222 Mo.App. 633 , 300 S.W. 834 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. Weber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.