Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 339 U.S. 844 - Roberts v. United States District Court

Roberts v. United States District Court’s Empirical Analysis

339 U.S. 844 · 1950

Citation profile

472
cited by 472 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

292 federal appellate · 3 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 472 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2023 · most notably Mitchell v. Forsyth (1985), Coppedge v. United States (1962)

292 federal appellate · 3 district · 23 state decisions

94019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Collett Kitpatrick v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 472 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The denial by a District Judge of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is an appealable order.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The decision of the District Court is in error. Citizenship for the purpose of in forma pauperis proceedings in the federal courts is solely a matter of federal law. Congress has not specified criminal convictions, except for desertion and treason, as grounds for loss of citizenship.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.