339 Wis. 2d 421 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · State v. Brown · State v. Thomas · State v. Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The standard for evaluating harmless error is the same whether the error is constitutional, statutory, or otherwise. An error is harmless if it does not affect the defendant's substantial rights.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We do not embrace a formalistic application of the Bangert requirements that would result in the abjuring of a defendant's representations in open court for insubstantial defects.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.