Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 A.2d 39 - McDevitt v. Waple & James, Inc.

McDevitt v. Waple & James, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1990

9 state decisions

60194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. Motor Boat Sales, Inc. · District Hauling & Construction Co. v. Argerakis · United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Levensaler · Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Lindeman · Meyer v. Capital Transit Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] custom has the force of law, and furnishes a standard for the measurement of many of the rights and acts of men. It must be certain or the measurements by this standard will be unequal and unjust.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.