¶1Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and the facts to limit the retroactivity of the award of $325 weekly insofar as it exceeds the temporary weekly alimony of $250, so that the same shall commence and be paid retroactively from May 7, 1968 rather than from February 15, 1966 when temporary alimony commenced, and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Although it is within the power of the trial court to provide that permanent alimony and child support payments shall be paid from the commencement of an action for divorce or separation (Forrest v. Forrest, 25 1ST. Y. 501; Burr v. Burr, 10 Paige ch. 20; Lowe v. Lowe, 28 A D 2d 212, affd. 21 N Y 2d 965), we conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the trial court to provide for retroactivity of the award from a date prior to the date of entry of the interlocutory decree of divorce. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
34 A.D.2d 907
Brown v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 9, 1970
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1970-06-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1982
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1970-06-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →