Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 Ala. App. 23 - Flournoy v. State

34 Ala. App. 23 - Flournoy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2007 · most notably Logan v. State (1973), 932 So. 2d 923 - Calhoun v. State (2005)

30 state decisions

1001948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 31 Ala. App. 571 - Mullins v. State · Moulton v. State · Davis v. State · Gibson v. State · Scott v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . [W]hen part of a conversation or transaction is put in evidence, the opposite party may rightfully call for the whole of it, although the evidence was in the first place illegal. Gibson v. State , 91 Ala. 64 , 9 So. 171 . Further, it has been held that when the defendant, on cross-examination of a witness elicits part of a conversation, the State may in rebuttal show the entire conversation. Davis v. Stone , 131 Ala. 10 , 31 So. 569 ; Flournoy v. State , 34 Ala. App. 23 , 37 So.2d 218 ."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ray v. State · 932 So. 2d 923 - Calhoun v. State
  2. “"Where the probative value of character testimony is rendered questionable because of remoteness in time, great weight should be accorded the trial judge's determination as to the admissibility of such evidence." Flournoy , 34 Ala. App. at 27 , 37 So.2d at 222.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 43 Ala. App. 38 - Lanier v. State · 365 So. 2d 350 - McDaniel v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.