Pass v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 Cal. App. 469 - People v. Disperati · State v. Rechnitz · 95 Tex. Crim. 564 - Rush v. State · 83 Tex. Crim. 442 - Grace v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The essentials of the crime of larceny [now called theft] are, first, the taking of the thing 'which is the subject of the crime from the possession of the owner into the possession of the thief; and, second, an asportation thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Butler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.