In Re Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2005
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329
Relies on United States v. Estus · Goeb v. Heid · Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. · Rimgale Ravenot v. S Rimgale · Deans v. O'Donnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If there remain creditors who are not to be paid in full under the plan, they should receive the increased dividend occasioned by the failure of others to file. To rule otherwise would impugn the process employed to calculate the debtor’s surplus income and the good faith of the debtor in proposing the plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Mitchell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.