In Re Zanetti’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1977 · most notably 7 Cal. 3d 126 - In Re Franklin (1972), 41 Cal. 2d 1 - Jamison v. Johnson (1953)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Alden · Kellogg v. Cochran · Sullivan v. Dunne · In Re Buchanan · In Re Estate of Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Insanity' may and does mean a variety of different things. Depending on the pertinent statute, a variety of issues of fact can be the subject of litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Protection of the incompetent from others is the main purpose of the statute [referring to section 1460, Probate Code].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roussel v. Hubbard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.