Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 CAL2D 552 - Taylor v. George

Taylor v. George’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
8
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably 127 Cal. App. 2d 442 - City of Los Angeles v. Gage (1954), Hornung v. Estate of Lagerquist (1970)

75 state decisions

23019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Superior Court · London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission · Newman v. Burwell · Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation District · Saunders v. Simms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The final decree of divorce was the judgment of a court in equity. . . . Section 732 of the Probate Code provides that a money judgment recovered against the decedent during his lifetime must be filed or presented to the executor or administrator in the same manner as other claims. It is apparent that in enacting section 732 the Legislature contemplated that if the executor rejects a creditor’s claim based upon a judgment rendered against the decedent in his lifetime, an action may be brought to establish the validity of the claim, and such has been assumed to be the rule in numerous eases.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In California the rule is that the obligation of a father to support his minor child which is fixed by divorce decree or property settlement agreement, does not cease upon the father's death, but survives as a charge against his estate. (Newman v. Burwell, 216 Cal. 608 [ 15 P.2d 511 ]; Estate of Smith, 200 Cal. 654 [ 254 P. 567 ]; Estate of Caldwell, 129 Cal.App. 613 [ 19 P.2d 9 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'An interlocutory judgment of divorce is, therefore, so far as it determines the rights of the parties, a contract between them'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.