Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 CAL2D 811 - Codorniz v. Codorniz

Codorniz v. Codorniz’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
7
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably 81 Ill. 2d 317 - Finley v. Finley (1980), 42 Cal. 2d 55 - Flynn v. Flynn (1954)

46 state decisions

140195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 26 Cal. 2d 605 - Hough v. Hough · 21 Cal. 2d 145 - Leupe v. Leupe · Puckett v. Puckett · Adams v. Adams · Sears Ettlinger v. Ettlinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Had the court found the provisions for support to have been in fact by way of property settlement, then the said provisions could not have been disturbed....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and that that court's findings based upon `ample evidence to support' such findings are likewise binding upon an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.