34 Cal. App. 384 - People v. Maljan’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 1964 · most notably Hirshfeld v. Dana (1924), State v. Spears (1953)
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Mathews · People v. Wardrip · 5 Cal. App. 329 - People v. White · People v. Ruiz · State v. Crosswhite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant cannot be heard to complain of this, for his attorney, on his attention being called to the fact that the hour of noon had arrived, distinctly and in open court waived the right to object to the trial proceeding into the afternoon, and this is a matter in which the defendant’s waiver is binding upon him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.