Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 CONN 280 - State v. Tuller

State v. Tuller’s Empirical Analysis

1867

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
15
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably State v. Evans (1973), State v. Hinckley (1985)

2 district · 44 state decisions — followed in 15 states

1201867187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In England, if two different felonies are charged in separate counts, the court will quash the indictment. But that is not the practice here; the court, if two distinct transactions are joined,'may direct the attorney to elect and to nolle one of the counts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.