Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 CONNAPP 694 - State v. Robins

State v. Robins’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably State v. Cassidy (1996), State v. Grenier (1999)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

1601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Evans · State v. Ellis · Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of Review · State v. Walton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person commits larceny when, with intent to deprive another of property or to appropriate the same to himself or a third person, he wrongfully takes, obtains or withholds such property from an owner. Larceny includes but is not limited to . . . (6) Defrauding of public community. A person is guilty of defrauding a public community who (A) authorizes, certifies, attests or files a claim for benefits or reimbursement from a local, state or federal agency which he knows is false; or (B) knowingly accepts the benefits from a claim he knows is false . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person is guilty of larceny in the first degree when he commits larceny as defined in section 53a-119 and . . . the property is obtained by defrauding a public community, and the value of such property exceeds two thousand dollars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sets forth two elements of the offense of defrauding a public community: (1) the defendant must have filed a claim for benefits . . . and (2) he must have done so knowing the claim to be false.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.