Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 CONNAPP 871 - Rodriguez v. Petrilli

Rodriguez v. Petrilli’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2017

10 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mather v. Griffin Hospital · Pontbriand v. Pontbriand · 25 Conn. App. 702 - Hammer v. Mount Sinai Hospital · In Re SR · State v. Marquis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of care required to be established and the qualifications of expert witnesses who may testify to establish that standard, in claims for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a health care provider, are con-trolled by ... § 52-184c. Whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert is a matter that rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. ... We have consistently held that the trial court's exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless it has been abused or the error is clear and involves a misconception of the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any health care provider may testify as an expert in any action if he. . ., to the satisfaction of the court, possess sufficient training, experience and knowledge as a result of practice or teaching in a related field of medicine, so as to be able to provide such expert testimony as to the prevailing professional standard of care in a given field of medicine. Such training, experience or knowledge shall be as a result of the active involvement in the practice or teaching of medicine within the five-year period before the incident giving rise to the claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “active involvement in the practice or teaching of [nursing] within the five year period before”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.