Rollins v. Lake County’s Empirical Analysis
34 F. 845 · 1888
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1894
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Burgess v. Seligman · Carroll County v. Smith · Pana v. Bowler · Anderson v. Township of Santa Anna in De Witt Illinois · Bolles v. Town of Brimfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the aggregate amount of indebtedness of any county for all purposes . . . shall not at any time exceed twice the amount above herein limited,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“and the aggregate amount of indebtedness of -any county, for all purposes,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.