Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 F.2d 127 - Brown v. Leo

Brown v. Leo’s Empirical Analysis

34 F.2d 127 · 1929

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2022

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

12019291930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lawrence E. Sexton v. Leopold Louis Dreyfus · Johnson v. Norris · Board of Com'rs v. Hurley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Neither the rule nor the reason for stopping interest at the date of the filing of the petition applies to an estate which turns out to be solvent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.