Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 F.3d 1075

Docket No. 93-15651.

Woo-Ming v. Thrasher

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted Aug. 11, 1994. Decided Aug. 26, 1994.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-08-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on United States v. Rosenbluth

Decided 1994-08-26

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: FLETCHER, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM*

¶2

Plaintiff Geoffrey E. Woo-Ming filed a complaint, alleging a violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981, 1983 and 1985. Woo-Ming appeals the district court's grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/34/f3d/1075 · .json · Public domain