Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 F.3d 13 - Rose v. Shalala

Rose v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

34 F.3d 13 · 1994

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 70 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Nguyen v. Chater (1999), Seavey v. Barnhart (2001)

11 federal appellate · 70 district ·

4101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Mcdonald v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) ... is a systemic disorder consisting of a complex of variable signs and symptoms which may vary in duration and severity. The etiology and pathology of the disorder have not been established. Although there are no generally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of cases of CFS, an operational concept is used by the medical community....” “CFS is characterized by the presence of persistent unexplained fatigue and by the chronicity of other symptoms. The most prevalent symptoms include episodes of low-grade fever, myalgias [muscle pain], headache, painful lymph nodes, and problems with memory and concentration. These symptoms fluctuate in frequency and severity and may be seen to continue over a period of many months. Physical examination may be within normal limits. Individual cases must be adjudicated on the basis of the totality of evidence, including the clinical course from the onset of the illness, symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings. Consideration should be given to onset, duration, severity and residual functional capacity following the sequential evaluation process.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he amount of weight that can properly be given the conclusions of non-testifying, non­ examining physicians will vary with the circumstances, including the nature of the illness and the information provided the expert.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The question here is the extent to which claimant's fatigue in fact restricts his residual functional capacity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.