United States v. Daddona’s Empirical Analysis
34 F.3d 163 · 1994
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · United States v. Inigo · United States v. Bierley · Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc. · United States v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no indication that this loss was due to the fraud of the [defendants].” Id.It instead found that the losses incurred in the post-foreclosure completion of the project were caused by the contractors' failure to timely fulfill their performance obligations. Id.It concluded:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no indication that this loss was due to the fraud of the [defendants].” Id.It instead found that the losses incurred in the post-foreclosure completion of the project were caused by the contractors' failure to timely fulfill their performance obligations. Id.It concluded: "Whatever losses Summit or others may have suffered from [defendants'] fraud, Summit has not demonstrated any losses which can fairly be measured by its cost to complete the project.” Id. at 172 . Likewise, whatever losses HUD and VA may have incurred from Randall's fraudulent bankruptcy filings, those losses cannot fairly be measured by their short sale losses and foreclosure expenses. Those losses were caused by her default, not her bankruptcy filings. 6 . Even if Randall's multiple filings did delay foreclosure proceedings, it is unclear from the evidence whether such a delay is fairly attributed to the fraudulent nature of those filings. The filing of any bankruptcy petition operates as a stay on debt collection activities. See 11 U.S.C. 362. Thus the delay may have been caused by. the mere fact that Randall filed one or more bankruptcy petitions, not the fact that her petitions contained false statements. Randall’s "serial filings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.