Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 F.3d 367

Docket No. 93-1456.

Nixon v. Kent County

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 21, 1994.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-11-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1996

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

¶2*384ORDER

¶3A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

¶4Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this ease is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

¶5The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

/34/f3d/367 · .json · Public domain