Wheel v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
34 F.3d 60 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Fama v. Commissioner of Correctional Services (2000), United States v. Awadallah (2003)
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Calandra · Smith v. Phillips · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`faced with a record of historical facts that supports conflicting inferences [a court] must presumeeven if it does not affirmatively appear in the recordthat the trier of fact resolved any such conflicts in favor of the prosecution, and must defer to that resolution.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall establish or it shall otherwise appear, or the respondent shall admit— (6) that the applicant did not receive a full, fair, and adequate hearing in the State court proceeding ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[t]he standard of review of a sufficiency claim by a federal habeas court is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Policano v. Herbert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.