House v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
34 F.3d 691 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Roberts v. Apfel (2000), Johnson v. Chater (1997)
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Polaski v. Heckler · Thomas v. Sullivan · Whitehouse v. Sullivan · Roberts v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support the [Commissioner]'s conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Chater · Bates v. Chater“of sedentary jobs Bates could perform. We conclude that the ALJ properly relied on the VE's testimony to find that jobs existed in the economy which Bates could perform. 12 Substantial evidence supports the Secretary's decision. Accordingly, we affirm. * As of March 31, 1995, the Social Security Administration became an independent agency from the Department of Health and Human Services. Therefore, the court has substituted Shirley S. Chater for Donna E. Shalala pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 43(c) 1 The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bates v. Chater“As is true in many disability cases, there is no doubt that the claimant is experiencing pain; the real issue is how severe that pain is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bates v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.