Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 F.3d 774 - Exxon Shipping Co

Exxon Shipping Co’s Empirical Analysis

34 F.3d 774 · 1994

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 15 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Mabe v. San Bernardino County (2001), Watts v. Securities & Exchange Commission (2007)

27 federal appellate · 15 district ·

4701994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 301 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on United States v. Nixon · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · United States v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not authorize withholding information from the public or limiting the availability of records to the public. " Id. Rather, the regulations simply set forth administrative procedures to be followed when demands for information are received. 10 The regulations are quite specific. They provide for disclosure of information to state courts after receipt of a "demand”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; (ii) the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or (iii) the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, taking into account the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the importance of the issues at stake in the litigation, and the importance of the proposed discovery in resolving the issues.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “discovery under Rules 26 and 45 must properly accommodate 'the government's serious and legitimate concern that its employee resources not be commandeered into service by private litigants to the detriment of the smooth functioning of government operations.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.