United States v. Articles of Banned Hazardous Substances Consisting of an Undetermined Number of Cans of Rainbow Foam Paint’s Empirical Analysis
34 F.3d 91 · 1994
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably United States v. Rahman (1999), Bf Goodrich
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1261 (Child Protection Act of 1966) · 15 U.S.C. § 1265 · 21 U.S.C. § 334 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Rubin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]xperts are not permitted to present testimony in the form of legal conclusions.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.