Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 F.3d 918 - Craft

Craft’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2018

20199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Mayers v. United States · Latimer v. Stainer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “: (1) alterations that occur when anchoring vessels; and (2) bottom trawling from a commercial fishing vessel. 15 C.F.R. Sec. 935.7(a)(2)(iii)(A) & (B). Moreover, contrary to appellants' contentions, the existence of listed exceptions to the prohibition on alterations further suggests that all alterations other than those that are specifically excepted are prohibited. 24 Appellants also rely on NOAA's Final Environmental Impact Statement (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it must be read to proscribe only major industrial and commercial impacts on the seabed. 23 This principle of statutory construction is inapplicable, however, because Sec. 935.7(a)(2)(iii) is not merely a general prohibition preceded by specific illustrative terms. Instead, the regulation includes two specific exceptions to the prohibition on”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “applies to a broad range of conduct. There can be no question but that this language prohibits the excavation activities in which appellants were engaged. 3 E.g., Austin, 902 F.2d at 743-45 (criminal provision that prohibits”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.