Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 FAPPX 394 - Hiltner v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Hiltner v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2006
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Times

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who willfully violates this section shall be guilty of a Class E crime. If the offender is an .... employee of the State, he shall be dismissed from office.” 5 . It is not at all clear whose right of privacy is at stake here. At oral argument, Plaintiff conceded that neither the decedent nor her estate could file a claim for invasion of privacy. An action for invasion of privacy "can be maintained only by a living individual whose privacy is invaded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.