Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 Fla. 363 - Lenfesty v. Coe

Lenfesty v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2012

15 state decisions

401894190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decree pro confesso cannot be extended to a confession of ownership of the note in complainant up to the time of the master's report and the confirmation thereof by the court, and the authorities above cited sustain the view that a production of the note or securities at the hearing is essential to show complainant's right to judgment then.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.