Ray v. State

Decided July 29, 1925

Decided 1925-07-29

Bloodworth, J.

¶11. There is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a rehearing of this ease.

*236Decided July 29, 1925.Smith & Watson, for plaintiff in error.E. S. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.

¶22. There is some evidence to support the verdict.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.