¶11. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in excluding from the jury certain testimony. -
¶22. The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
¶3Judgment affirmed.
34 Ga. App. 39
Hill v. Bennett
Decided May 14, 1925
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1925-05-14
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1927
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-05-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →