Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 Ill. App. 3d 677 - Smith v. Williams

34 Ill. App. 3d 677 - Smith v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 119 Ill. App. 3d 713 - Bass v. Washington-Kinney Co. (1983), 73 Ill. App. 3d 288 - People v. Rhoads (1979)

49 state decisions

250197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hickey · 61 Ill. 2d 559 - People v. Ward · The People v. Black · 22 Ill. 2d 420 - The PEOPLE v. Armstrong · 43 Ill. App. 2d 251 - Johnson v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Any writing or record, whether in the form of an entry in a book or otherwise, made as a memorandum or record of any act, transaction, occurrence, or event, shall be admissible as evidence of the act, transaction, occurrence, or event, if made in the regular course of any business, and if it was the regular course of the business to make such a memorandum or record at the time of such an act, transaction, occurrence, or event or within a reasonable time thereafter. All other circumstances of the making of the writing or record, including lack of personal knowledge by the entrant or maker, may be shown to affect its weight, but shall not affect its admissibility. The term ‘business,’ as used in this rule, includes business, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.