Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 Ind. 104

Baker v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1870-11-15

<p>Criminal Law.— Venue.—Time.—There can be no conviction under an information for an assault, where the State fails to prove any time or place of the commission of the offense.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1870-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1940

9 state decisions

4018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Buskirk, J.

¶1The appellant was prosecuted in the court below for having committed an assault upon the person of Thomas W. Batman. There was a trial by j ury; verdict against appellant. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled, and exception was taken. Judgment was rendered on the verdict. The affidavit and information charge that the offense was committed in Putnam county, in the State of Indiana, on or about the ioth day of September, 1869. The evidence is in the record, and we have examined it with care, and have been unable to find any evidence tending to show when or where the offense was committed. Before the appellant could have been convicted, it was necessary for the State to prove that the offense had been committed in the county of Putnam, and within two years before the commencement of the prosecution.

¶2The appellant also complains of the instructions given by the court of its own motion, and of the refusal of the court to give certain instructions asked by him. As the case will have to be reversed for the failure of the State to prove the time when and the place where the offense was committed, we have not examined the errors assigned upon the giving and the refusal to give the instructions complained o£

¶3Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

/34/ind/104 · .json · Public domain