Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

34 Ind. 401

Tyner v. Adams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1870-11-15

<p>Assignment of Errors.—New Trial.—Where the overruling of a motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, the Supreme- Court will not consider any error properly constituting a cause for a new trial, though it be assigned as error.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1889

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1870-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Worden, J.

¶1This was an action by the appellee against: *402the appellants to foreclose a mortgage. Trial by the court; finding and judgment for the plaintiff, a motion for a new trial being overruled.

¶2There is no assignment of error upon any ruling of the court upon the pleadings in the cause, nor upon the ruling of the court in overruling the motion for a new: trial. The errors assigned are all such as were proper to be considered on a motion for a new trial, and as no error is assigned on the ruling upon that motion, the record presents no question for our consideration. This was decided several times by the late court, and the decisions have been followed several times by the court as at present constituted.

¶3The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and five per cent damages.

/34/ind/401 · .json · Public domain