¶1I concur in the conclusion, but am of the opinion that the remonstrance in its present form is insufficient. The court below should have permitted appellants to amend the remonstrance by inserting the words “in the first ward of.” An amendment of a remonstrance on an appeal from the board of commissioners is allowable. Stockwell v. Brant (1884), 97 Ind. 474; Hardesty v. Hine (1893), 135 Ind. 72.
34 Ind. App. 473
Bryan v. DeMoss
Decided January 24, 1905
Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1905-01-24
Erom Monroe Circuit Court; James B. Wilson, Judge. Application by Enos S. De Moss for license to sell intoxicating liquors, to which William L. Bryan and others file a remonstrance. From a judgment of the circuit court reversing a judgment of the board of commissioners refusing such license, the remonstrants appeal.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1911
2 state decisions
Relies on Stockwell v. Brant · Hardesty v. Hine
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1905-01-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →