Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1885
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1933
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Winninger · Waugh v. People · State v. Buffum · Barringer v. State · 6 Tex. Ct. App. 316 - Neblett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A recognizance taken by a court without jurisdiction, or by an officer without authority is void.’ The sheriff was bound to pursue his authority strictly, and when he departed from it and required bail in excess of the order of the district court he acted without authority, and the recognizance was as void as if he had no authority whatever to require bail.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cox v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.