Davis v. Hildyard’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · St. Amant v. Thompson · Bowen v. Westerhaus · Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp. · 9 Kan. App. 2d 620 - Luttrell v. United Telephone System, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]road and factually unsupported allegations ... do not support a claim for damages for alleged defamation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.