State v. McFadden’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Scheffer · State v. Smallwood · Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. · State v. Jenkins · Hiatt v. Groce
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] lay witness is not competent to provide reliable testimony about medical matters beyond the common knowledge of laypersons, or those [matters] that are not readily apparent such as medical diagnoses or the effects of a possible medical condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Edmonds“lay witnesses are not competent to provide reliable testimony about medical matters . . . that are not readily apparent such as medical diagnosis or the effects of possible medical conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a lay witness may testify about the external appearances and manifest medical conditions that are readily apparent to anyone,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.