Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 34 KANAPP2D 473 - State v. McFadden

State v. McFadden’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Scheffer · State v. Smallwood · Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. · State v. Jenkins · Hiatt v. Groce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] lay witness is not competent to provide reliable testimony about medical matters beyond the common knowledge of laypersons, or those [matters] that are not readily apparent such as medical diagnoses or the effects of a possible medical condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “lay witnesses are not competent to provide reliable testimony about medical matters . . . that are not readily apparent such as medical diagnosis or the effects of possible medical conditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a lay witness may testify about the external appearances and manifest medical conditions that are readily apparent to anyone,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.